Crawl paths
We check blocked pages, orphaned URLs, and internal links that waste crawl effort or bury the right content.
Send your name, email address, and the reason you are getting in touch. I will reply with the clearest next step.
We find crawl, indexation, Core Web Vitals, internal-link and structured-data problems, then turn them into a prioritised fix plan a small business can act on.

These are the patterns we see most often before organic growth stalls.
We check blocked pages, orphaned URLs, and internal links that waste crawl effort or bury the right content.
We look at template weight, render timing, and layout shifts that slow users and send weak quality signals.
We confirm that canonicals, sitemaps, and duplicate URLs point to the same commercial priority.
The output is a commercial brief, not a generic checklist.
| Area | What we inspect | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Crawl access | robots.txt, noindex rules, canonical rules, and XML sitemap coverage | Lets search engines reach the pages that matter |
| Site speed | Core Web Vitals, scripts, image weight, and render timing | Improves user experience and page-level quality signals |
| Architecture | Navigation depth, internal links, and orphan pages | Pushes authority towards the pages that need it |
| Duplication | Canonical tags, parameters, and URL variants | Prevents signal split and wasted crawl budget |
| Structured data | Schema types, entity clarity, and validation | Helps classify the page and its purpose |
| Indexation | Coverage reports, exclusions, and soft 404s | Shows which pages are missing or misread |
| Mobile rendering | Content parity, tap targets, and usable layouts | Supports real users and mobile-first indexing |
Small UK businesses need a prioritised fix plan, not an enterprise-sized list of warnings.
A technical SEO audit is the right starting point when a small business has useful pages but rankings stay flat, important URLs remain undiscovered, or a redesign has introduced crawl and performance problems.
We use Google Search Console, PageSpeed Insights, and crawl data to separate signal from noise, then prioritise the work that will unlock the fastest gains.
The audit becomes a practical brief for the owner, marketer or developer, keeping the next phase commercially focused and proportionate to the available budget.
These relationships are the reason technical SEO is treated as a commercial input, not a housekeeping task.
| Subject | Predicate | Object |
|---|---|---|
| Site architecture | influences | crawl depth and internal link equity |
| Crawl budget | determines | how quickly new or updated pages are discovered |
| Canonical tags | resolve | duplicate URL signals |
| Core Web Vitals | affect | user experience and page-level performance |
| Structured data | helps | search engines classify the page |
You get a practical report that explains the issue, the impact, and the recommended fix path.
Yes. The recommendations are written so they can be handed to an in-house marketer, developer, or external partner.
Absolutely. That is one of the best times to audit the site because architecture and redirects can be corrected before the new build goes live.
Yes. We check how technical issues affect the visibility, structure, and performance of the content that should earn traffic.
If your current marketing activity is not producing a measurable return — or if you are entering a new channel and want to get it right from the start — the next step is a free audit.
We review your current performance, identify the gaps, and return a written strategy proposal within 48 hours. No obligation. No sales pitch dressed as advice.